STAND UP FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
trimethoprim bactrim, then nexium online doctors, then , then order norvasc online cod, then neurontin for pain, then cheap paxil online order paxil now, then diflucan with overnight fedex, then buy cipro canada, then order plavix online cod, then cheapest wellbutrin shipping usa, then order acyclovir cod overnight delivery, then propecia ups delivery, then valtrex generic for cold sores in sao paulo, then cheap prescription atomoxetine, then how to buy inderal online, then zovirax without a dr, then buy prozac without prescription needed, then buy premarin cod, then purchase prescription free doxycycline, then price retin-a direct tabletas, then no prescriptions needed for amoxil, then arimidex hcl tablets, then who sells baclofen in vancouver, then buy cod day next lasix, then clomid alcohol, then buy flagyl er discount sale, then overnight zithromax order, then desyrel vs desyrel professional, then purchase accutane online no membership, then buy hydrochlorothiazide cheap, then
, as buy elavil canada, as cheap cod trazodone, as , as crestor fed ex cheap, as tenormin cash delivery cod, as nizoral without a prescription online with overnight delivery, as , as buy deltasone without rx, as buy glucophage online get prescription, as abilify with saturday delivery, as buy overnight delivery cheap aciphex, as buy erythromycin online no rx, as get biaxin discount, as microzide purchase on line no prescription fast delivery, as , as inderal overnight no prescription, as proscar hcl 50mg 100mg cod, as atarax no prior script, as i want to order protonix without a prescription, as cheapest naprosyn no prescription next day shipping, as robaxin doctor, as zantac free saturday delivery, as , as buy ampicillin cash on delivery, as pravachol bontril trazodone, as , as buy nolvadex over the counter fedex, as effexor on line no script, as order claritin free next day air, as discount prednisone, as lopressor overnight no prescription, as

The “Judicial Theocracy” of the HHS Mandate

Posted by John Jansen (January 4, 2013 at 5:04 pm)

Stand Up for Religious Freedom signsEarlier today the Stand Up for Religious Freedom Coalition encouraged everyone to take part in Standing with Hobby Lobby Day tomorrow, January 5.

Hobby Lobby’s owners, David and Barbara Green, filed a federal lawsuit over the HHS Mandate last year, but their request for emergency injunctive relief was denied by federal district Judge Joe Heaton, meaning that the Greens could face $1.3 million in fines per day for their refusal to comply with the Mandate, which went into effect January 1.

A fascinating article appeared in The Public Discourse this week that points out the rather frightening implications of Judge Heaton’s ruling, as well as another ruling by Judge Carol Jackson, who had previously dismissed another challenge to the HHS Mandate brought by St. Louis businessman Frank O’Brien. (Jackson’s ruling was subsequently overturned by the Eighth Circuit federal appeals court, but Heaton’s ruling was upheld by Tenth Circuit.)

The article is provocatively titled “The HHS Mandate and Judicial Theocracy.” In it, Dr. Melissa Moschella draws attention to the core of the argument put forth by Judges Jackson and Heaton and their respective decisions:

“The burden of which plaintiffs complain is that funds, which plaintiffs will contribute to a group health plan, might, after a series of independent decisions by health care providers and patients …, subsidize someone else’s participation in an activity that is condemned by plaintiffs’ religion.” Jackson goes on to claim that subsidizing these objectionable services is no different from paying an employee’s salary, which the employee may then use to purchase contraception or procure an abortion. Judge Heaton agrees.

The problem, however, is that paying an employee’s salary and providing that same employee with health insurance coverage for specific services are vastly different things, akin to “the difference between giving cash to someone, and giving, say, a gift certificate to a steakhouse.”

Dr. Moschella writes:

[I]t becomes clear that while paying a salary has no intelligible link to any particular use of that salary, giving insurance—a voucher for a specific range of products and services—does have an intelligible link to precisely those products and services for which it may be used.

She goes on to warn, chillingly:

If, on the other hand, Jackson and Heaton are right that there is no difference between paying a salary and offering insurance coverage, then employers would also have no reason to object to a mandate requiring that all health plans cover surgical abortions.

Surely, were the HHS Mandate to hold up in court, mandatory insurance coverage for surgical abortions will soon follow. We delude ourselves if we think otherwise.

Moschella then gets to the heart of the matter:

Jackson and Heaton’s logic is therefore inherently flawed: giving money, a perfectly fungible good, differs significantly from giving insurance, which has an intelligible link to a limited range of products and services.

But even if the reasoning were sound, it is nonetheless problematic because its subject matter—moral theology—does not belong in a court decision at all. By using this argument to deny that the mandate constitutes a substantial burden on religious practice, these judges are stepping well outside their proper area of competence. They are making a decision not based on legal reasoning, but on philosophical and theological judgment.

In her ruling, Judge Jackson actually wrote that, notwithstanding the plaintiffs’ claims that complying with the HHS Mandate would violate their bona fide religious beliefs, “the challenged regulations do not … prevent plaintiffs from acting in accordance with their religious beliefs.”

So much for the separation of church and state!

As Moschella rightly observes:

In effect, Judges Jackson and Heaton are telling the Greens and Frank O’Brien—and by extension the 108 other plaintiffs challenging the mandate as well—that they, and the religious authorities who support them, simply have their theology wrong.

It’s more than a little troubling when judges take upon themselves the prerogative of making determinations about moral theology.

God save our honorable courts.

Posted in News and Commentary. Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a free and open exchange of ideas on this blog, from all points of view, but we request that you restrict your remarks to the topic under discussion in the above entry.

To ensure constructive dialog, the following will not be tolerated:

For long links, please use a service like Tiny URL to shorten the link—or use link tags: replace the text in red with your complete link, and the text in green with a word or phrase that describes the link:

Here's a <a href="http://www.website.com/page.htm">link</a>.

neurontin no script fedex, so a premarin cream for vaginal atrophy, so a canadian pharmacies strattera, so a cod desyrel cod free fedex, so a no prescriptions needed for norvasc, so a prescription hydrochlorothiazide online, so a buy amoxil online discount cheap, so a plavix and cod saturday delivery, so a retin-a prescription from doctors online, so a lasix buy without a prescription, so a acyclovir dosing instructions, so a nexium without a prescription, so a clomid success stories, so a bactrim ds tablet pre, so a zithromax online cash on delivery, so a cheap paxil overnight delivery, so a internet flagyl er sales, so a doxycycline discount fedex no prescription, so a buy zovirax without rx, so a order diflucan without rx from us pharmacy, so a order no online prescription baclofen, so a order online rx arimidex without, so a wellbutrin generic study, so a accutane perscription on line, so a cipro tablet 500, so a prozac online delivery, so a buy propecia drugs, so a valtrex without a prescription and cod delivery, so a order online rx inderal, so a
no prescription required for glucophage, so a buy seroquel no prescription, so a buy augmentin now, so a order cephalexin from mexico online, so a pravachol online with next day shipping, so a purchase accupril no visa without prescription, so a topamax with no prescription, so a cheap aciphex sales, so a elavil and feline dosage for cats, so a zyprexa buy cod, so a celebrex overnight delivery only, so a prilosec ineffective, so a order cheap zyrtec without prescription, so a purchase zyloprim in alabama, so a allegra no prescription cash on delivery, so a order cymbalta cod next day delivery, so a can zoloft be broken in half, so a buy cheap effexor, so a order celexa without, so a buy zyban all us regions south dakota, so a order fosamax cheap, so a free prescription prednisone, so a weight zoloft vs lexapro, so a cheap levaquin pil without script, so a atarax w/o, so a zocor and headaches, so a c o d shipping for buspar, so a online pharmacies no prescription prevacid, so a lisinopril look like, so a baclofen zanaflex, so a flomax and hives, so a