STAND UP FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
trimethoprim bactrim, then nexium online doctors, then , then order norvasc online cod, then neurontin for pain, then cheap paxil online order paxil now, then diflucan with overnight fedex, then buy cipro canada, then order plavix online cod, then cheapest wellbutrin shipping usa, then order acyclovir cod overnight delivery, then propecia ups delivery, then valtrex generic for cold sores in sao paulo, then cheap prescription atomoxetine, then how to buy inderal online, then zovirax without a dr, then buy prozac without prescription needed, then buy premarin cod, then purchase prescription free doxycycline, then price retin-a direct tabletas, then no prescriptions needed for amoxil, then arimidex hcl tablets, then who sells baclofen in vancouver, then buy cod day next lasix, then clomid alcohol, then buy flagyl er discount sale, then overnight zithromax order, then desyrel vs desyrel professional, then purchase accutane online no membership, then buy hydrochlorothiazide cheap, then

Religious Freedom vs. the Siren Song of Consequence-Free Sex

Posted by John Jansen (January 10, 2014 at 10:42 am)

PP video re ACARecently Planned Parenthood sent out an email to their supporters highlighting their “Top 5″ moments from 2013.

Considering how much time and resources the nation’s largest abortion chain put in to shilling for the Affordable Care Act/ACA/Obamacare, it’s no surprise that the ACA’s provision that employers—regardless of any conscientious objection—provide free contraception made the list.

Notice how Planned Parenthood framed it:

The ACA covers preventive care with no copay under all plans — meaning women get birth control with no out-of-pocket cost. Many women now have access to affordable birth control for the first time ever. There’s really only one response to that:


dancing

In other words: non-stop (literally!) frivolity. Beyond parody, that.

Note the subtext:

Women (and men) have a right to consequence-free sex, and if some people don’t like paying for your birth control, too bad for them. Let’s get this party started!

The Growing Hostility Toward Religious Freedom

In an excellent article titled “Sex, Drugs, and Religious Liberty” published earlier this week on Public Discourse, Carissa Mulder outlines several threats to individual religious freedom that have been publicized in recent years: e.g., various business owners—photographers, bakers, etc.,—who have run afoul of the law after refusing to have anything to do with same-sex “weddings,” and Christian nurses in New Jersey who were forced to assist with abortions.

She also mentions, of course, the HHS Mandate, to which Planned Parenthood believes the “only response” is to get up and dance.

Mulder then asks:

How did we get here? People commonly point to the gay rights movement. It is true that the clash between sexual license and religious liberty is most often seen in the context of gay rights. But step back for a moment. In a 2012 survey of 120,000 American adults, Gallup found that only 3.4 percent identified as LGBT. How could such a small minority so dramatically change prevailing opinion?

The answer may lie in [Douglas] Laycock’s statement: Americans resent religion’s perceived interference in their sex lives. The president of the Barna Group, an evangelical market research organization, recently observed that “Young people’s most common complaint . . . is that churches are too focused on sexual issues.” The consequences of same-sex marriage may pose the gravest threat to religious liberty, but the cultural conditions and assumptions that make that threat possible are rooted in heterosexual behavior.

This is a curious attitude, given that no religion in America has the legal ability to force anyone, adherent or not, to follow its teachings regarding sexual morality or anything else. An evangelical Christian can impregnate his girlfriend and keep his head firmly attached to his body, unlike the situation faced by Claudio in Measure for Measure. A Catholic can buy a package of condoms at the local drugstore. The clerk won’t ask to check his religious identification before ringing up the purchase. And women of any religious persuasion can obtain an abortion in all fifty states.

Why, then, does it seem that a growing number of Americans view religious liberty with suspicion, if not outright hostility? The problem is that many Americans are offended by the existence of an opposing view. The fact that someone, somewhere, dares to voice disapproval of their sexual behavior is, it now seems, offensive in and of itself. Studied non-judgmentalism is one of the hallmarks of contemporary American culture, with departures viewed as gauche at least or, more commonly, as an illegitimate attack on the sacrosanct individual. If you doubt this, please try telling a group of largely secular thirty-somethings that you believe cohabitation is wrong and see what response you receive.

Later, Mulder trenchantly notes:

To illustrate the degree of the incursion on religious conscience, religious liberty advocates often compare the contraception mandate to requiring all Jewish deli owners to serve pork sandwiches or requiring a Muslim business owner to pick up the tab for his employee’s heart-healthy red wine. This is a valid comparison, but perhaps the average American thinks, “Oh, the government would never do that.” And they’re right; probably the government never would. Why? Because food is considered too unimportant to be bothered with, whereas consequence-free sex has become an American totem.

Exactly. Although, of course, since nature bats last, the idea that sex can be free of consequences merely by willing it so is a siren song.

Safeguarding Religious Freedom for Employees and Employers

Stop Obama's HHS Mandate signSince the HHS Mandate was first announced nearly two years ago, religious freedom advocates have pointed out that contraception is already widely available—at little or even no cost—which is why arguments that women will “lose access to reproductive rights” if employers are not compelled to provide it are nonsensical.

For decades, our nation has respected the First Amendment guaranteed freedom of employers by not forcing them to provide their employees with insurance coverage for services they believe are immoral. But now—since, historically speaking, five minutes ago—the Obama Administration has decided that individual employers should be stripped of this freedom.

Last summer, a Muslim teenager who worked at an Abercrombie & Fitch store in California was fired because she insisted on wearing a hijab while at work. She sued, claiming her individual religious freedom was violated. And, realizing they didn’t have a leg to stand on, A&F settled.

Just as this Muslim teenager—an employee—cannot be compelled to check her individual religious freedom at the door when she shows up to work, so too an employer cannot be compelled to check her religious freedom at the door when she shows up to work.

Tags: , , , , , , , , Posted in News and Commentary. Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Religious Freedom vs. the Siren Song of Consequence-Free Sex”

  1. limapie says:

    Just wanted to add…if Hobby Lobby is not successful at the SCOTUS, then the ground is thus laid. If a cult ‘religious’ type law succeeds in making it’s way into our law books, the precedent of the HHS Mandate will force Christians against their will to follow even more immorality. I certainly hope SCOTUS understands this, especially the new left-leaning justices.

    February 2nd, 2014 at 4:24 pm

Leave a Reply

We welcome a free and open exchange of ideas on this blog, from all points of view, but we request that you restrict your remarks to the topic under discussion in the above entry.

To ensure constructive dialog, the following will not be tolerated:

For long links, please use a service like Tiny URL to shorten the link—or use link tags: replace the text in red with your complete link, and the text in green with a word or phrase that describes the link:

Here's a <a href="http://www.website.com/page.htm">link</a>.

neurontin no script fedex, so a premarin cream for vaginal atrophy, so a canadian pharmacies strattera, so a cod desyrel cod free fedex, so a no prescriptions needed for norvasc, so a prescription hydrochlorothiazide online, so a buy amoxil online discount cheap, so a plavix and cod saturday delivery, so a retin-a prescription from doctors online, so a lasix buy without a prescription, so a acyclovir dosing instructions, so a nexium without a prescription, so a clomid success stories, so a bactrim ds tablet pre, so a zithromax online cash on delivery, so a cheap paxil overnight delivery, so a internet flagyl er sales, so a doxycycline discount fedex no prescription, so a buy zovirax without rx, so a order diflucan without rx from us pharmacy, so a order no online prescription baclofen, so a order online rx arimidex without, so a wellbutrin generic study, so a accutane perscription on line, so a cipro tablet 500, so a prozac online delivery, so a buy propecia drugs, so a valtrex without a prescription and cod delivery, so a order online rx inderal, so a
no prescription required for glucophage, so a buy seroquel no prescription, so a buy augmentin now, so a order cephalexin from mexico online, so a pravachol online with next day shipping, so a purchase accupril no visa without prescription, so a topamax with no prescription, so a cheap aciphex sales, so a elavil and feline dosage for cats, so a zyprexa buy cod, so a celebrex overnight delivery only, so a prilosec ineffective, so a order cheap zyrtec without prescription, so a purchase zyloprim in alabama, so a allegra no prescription cash on delivery, so a order cymbalta cod next day delivery, so a can zoloft be broken in half, so a buy cheap effexor, so a order celexa without, so a buy zyban all us regions south dakota, so a order fosamax cheap, so a free prescription prednisone, so a weight zoloft vs lexapro, so a cheap levaquin pil without script, so a atarax w/o, so a zocor and headaches, so a c o d shipping for buspar, so a online pharmacies no prescription prevacid, so a lisinopril look like, so a baclofen zanaflex, so a flomax and hives, so a